Frequency-swept feedback interferometry for noncooperative-target ranging with a stand-off distance of several hundred meters

1.
The State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, Department of Precision Instrument, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
2.
Institute of Laser Engineering, Faculty of Materials and Manufacturing, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China

Funds: The authors gratefully acknowledge the team of Prof. F Zhang from Tianjin University and the team of Prof. G Liu from Harbin Institute of Technology for technical support.

摘要

- /
- /
- /
Abstract: Frequency-swept interferometry (FSI) is a powerful ranging method with high precision and immunity to ambient light. However, the stand-off distance of the current FSI-based ranging system for noncooperative targets is relatively short because the weak echo power cannot provide the needed signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Here, we report a ranging method that combines FSI and the laser feedback technique. Compared with conventional FSI, the interference between the weak echo signal and the local oscillator occurs in the laser cavity, which enhances the signal spontaneously and then provides an improved SNR. In the experiments, the detection limit of the echo power is less than 0.1 fW, with a 1 mW probe beam. Based on the enhancement from the laser feedback technique, the system can detect a noncooperative target that is up to hundreds of meters away in space without extra optical amplifiers. On the other hand, a large stand-off distance makes the system sensitive to environmental disturbance, which degrades the ranging precision. To address this issue, an interferometry-based compensation device, which is also sensitive to weak echoes from noncooperative targets, is proposed to monitor the optical-path-length drifts and ensure accurate beat frequency recognition. Moreover, the device can record distance changes during the integration time of ranging and track a moving target precisely with improved temporal resolution. Owing to the high sensitivity and the validity of the compensation approach, the standard deviation in 10 measurements is better than 0.07 mm when targeting an aluminum sheet at approximately 152 m. Generally, with a large range, high relative precision, and low photon consumption, the novel technical scheme for laser ranging demonstrates new capabilities that promise to enable a wide range of applications, such as large equipment assembly and noncooperative-target tracking.
- Frequency-swept interferometry /
- Laser ranging /
- Laser feedback technique /
- Remote noncooperative targets

HTML全文

参考文献(53)

[1]	Coddington I, Swann WC, Nenadovic L, Newbury NR. Rapid and precise absolute distance measurements at long range. Nat Photonics. 2009;3(6):351–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2009.94.
[2]	Lu F, Milios E. Robot pose estimation in unknown environments by matching 2D range scans. J Intell Rob Syst. 1997;18(3):249–75. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007957421070.
[3]	Uttam D, Culshaw B. Precision time domain reflectometry in optical fiber systems using a frequency modulated continuous wave ranging technique. J Lightwave Technol. 1985;3(5):971–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.1985.1074315.
[4]	Trocha P, Kemal JN, Gaimard Q, Aubin G, Lelarge F, Ramdane A, et al. Ultra-fast optical ranging using quantum-dash mode-locked laser diodes. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):1076. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04368-4.
[5]	Mitchell EW, Hoehler MS, Giorgetta FR, Hayden T, Rieker GB, Newbury NR, et al. Coherent laser ranging for precision imaging through flames. Optica. 2018;5(8). https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.5.000988.
[6]	Levinson J, Askeland J, Becker J, Dolson J, Held D, Kammel S, et al. Towards Fully Autonomous Driving: Systems and Algorithms. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). 2011. p. 163–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2011.5940562.
[7]	Steindorfer MA, Kirchner G, Koidl F, Wang P, Jilete B, Flohrer T. Daylight space debris laser ranging. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):3735. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17332-z.
[8]	Wang Z, Potsaid B, Chen L, Doerr C, Lee HC, Nielson T, et al. Cubic meter volume optical coherence tomography. Optica. 2016;3(12):1496–503. https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.3.001496.
[9]	Ula RK, Noguchi Y, Iiyama K. Three-Dimensional Object Profiling Using Highly Accurate FMCW Optical Ranging System. J Lightwave Technol. 2019;37(15):3826–33. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2019.2921353.
[10]	Lee J, Kim Y-J, Lee K, Lee S, Kim S-W. Time-of-flight measurement with femtosecond light pulses. Nat Photonics. 2010;4(10):716–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010.175.
[11]	Martin A, Verheyen P, De Heyn P, Absil P, Feneyrou P, Bourderionnet J, et al. Photonic Integrated Circuit-Based FMCW Coherent LiDAR. J Lightwave Technol. 2018;36(19):4640–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2018.2840223.
[12]	Dong Y, Zhu Z, Tian X, Qiu L, Ba D. Frequency-Modulated Continuous-Wave LIDAR and 3D Imaging by Using Linear Frequency Modulation Based on Injection Locking. J Lightwave Technol. 2021;39(8):2275–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2021.3050772.
[13]	Hauser M, Hofbauer M. FPGA-Based EO-PLL With Repetitive Control for Highly Linear Laser Frequency Tuning in FMCW LIDAR Applications. IEEE Photonics J. 2022;14(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/jphot.2021.3139053.
[14]	Zhang F-M, Li Y-T, Pan H, Shi C-Z, Qu X-H. Vibration Compensation of the Frequency-Scanning-Interferometry-Based Absolute Ranging System. Applied Sciences. 2019;9(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9010147.
[15]	Cheng X, Liu J, Jia L, Zhang F, Qu X. Precision and repeatability improvement in frequency-modulated continuous-wave velocity measurement based on the splitting of beat frequency signals. Opt Express. 2021;29(18):28582–96. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.433637.
[16]	Li B, Mo D, Wang P, Gan N, Lin M, Wang R, et al. FMCW lidar multitarget detection based on skeleton tree waveform matching. Appl Opt. 2021;60(27):8328–35. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.431516.
[17]	Pan H, Qu X, Zhang F. Micron-precision measurement using a combined frequency-modulated continuous wave ladar autofocusing system at 60 meters standoff distance. Opt Express. 2018;26(12):15186–98. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.26.015186.
[18]	Baumann E, Giorgetta FR, Deschenes JD, Swann WC, Coddington I, Newbury NR. Comb-calibrated laser ranging for three-dimensional surface profiling with micrometer-level precision at a distance. Opt Express. 2014;22(21):24914–28. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.024914.
[19]	Hao Y, Song P, Wang X, Pan Z. A Spectrum Correction Algorithm Based on Beat Signal of FMCW Laser Ranging System. Sensors (Basel). 2021;21(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/s21155057.
[20]	Okano M, Chong C. Swept Source Lidar: simultaneous FMCW ranging and nonmechanical beam steering with a wideband swept source. Opt Express. 2020;28(16):23898–915. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.396707.
[21]	Norgia M, Melchionni D, Pesatori A. Self-mixing instrument for simultaneous distance and speed measurement. Opt Lasers Eng. 2017;99:31–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2016.10.013.
[22]	Zhang X, Kwon K, Henriksson J, Luo J, Wu MC. A large-scale microelectromechanical-systems-based silicon photonics LiDAR. Nature. 2022;603(7900):253–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04415-8.
[23]	Norgia M, Magnani A, Pesatori A. High resolution self-mixing laser rangefinder. Rev Sci Instrum. 2012;83(4): 045113. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3703311.
[24]	Lu C, Xiang Y, Gan Y, Liu B, Chen F, Liu X, et al. FSI-based non-cooperative target absolute distance measurement method using PLL correction for the influence of a nonlinear clock. Opt Lett. 2018;43(9):2098–101. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.43.002098.
[25]	Mateo AB, Barber ZW. Multi-dimensional, non-contact metrology using trilateration and high resolution FMCW ladar. Appl Opt. 2015;54(19):5911–6. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.54.005911.
[26]	Zhang K, Lv T, Mo D, Wang N, Wang R, Wu Y. Double sideband frequency scanning interferometry for distance measurement in the outdoor environment. Optics Communications. 2018;425:176–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2018.04.056.
[27]	Ahmad Z, Liao Y-M, Kuo S-I, Chang Y-C, Chao R-L, Naseem, et al. High-Power and High-Responsivity Avalanche Photodiodes for Self-Heterodyne FMCW Lidar System Applications. IEEE Access. 2021;9:85661–71. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3089082.
[28]	Taimre T, Nikolic M, Bertling K, Lim YL, Bosch T, Rakic AD. Laser feedback interferometry: a tutorial on the self-mixing effect for coherent sensing. Advances in Optics and Photonics. 2015;7(3):570–631. https://doi.org/10.1364/aop.7.000570.
[29]	Giuliani G, Norgia M, Donati S, Bosch T. Laser diode self-mixing technique for sensing applications. Journal of Optics a-Pure and Applied Optics. 2002;4(6):S283–94. https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4258/4/6/371.
[30]	Otsuka K. Self-mixing thin-slice solid-state laser Doppler velocimetry with much less than one feedback photon per Doppler cycle. Opt Lett. 2015;40(20):4603–6. https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.40.004603.
[31]	Lacot E, Day R, Stoeckel F. Coherent laser detection by frequency-shifted optical feedback. Physical Review A. 2001;64(4). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.043815.
[32]	Zhu K, Guo B, Lu Y, Zhang S, Tan Y. Single-spot two-dimensional displacement measurement based on self-mixing interferometry. Optica. 2017;4(7). https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.4.000729.
[33]	Zhao Y, Zhu D, Chen Y, Tu Y, Bi T, Zhao Y, et al. All-fiber self-mixing laser Doppler velocimetry with much less than 0.1 pW optical feedback based on adjustable gain. Optics Letters. 2020;45(13):3565–8. https://doi.org/10.1364/ol.397819.
[34]	Otsuka K, Ohtomo T, Makino H, Sudo S, Ko JY. Net motion of an ensemble of many Brownian particles captured with a self-mixing laser. Appl Phys Lett. 2009;94(24):3. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3156826.
[35]	Mowla A, Bertling K, Wilson SJ, Rakic AD. Dual-Modality Confocal Laser Feedback Tomography for Highly Scattering Medium. IEEE Sens J. 2019;19(15):6134–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2019.2910122.
[36]	Gouaux F, Servagent N, Bosch T. Absolute distance measurement with an optical feedback interferometer. Appl Opt. 1998;37(28):6684–9. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.37.006684.
[37]	Lu C, Liu G, Liu B, Chen F, Gan Y. Absolute distance measurement system with micron-grade measurement uncertainty and 24 m range using frequency scanning interferometry with compensation of environmental vibration. Opt Express. 2016;24(26):30215–24. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.030215.
[38]	Hugon O, Lacot E, Stoeckel F. Submicrometric displacement and vibration measurement using optical feedback in a fiber laser. Fiber Integr Opt. 2003;22(5):283–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/01468030390221696.
[39]	Szwaj C, Lacot E, Hugon O. Large linewidth-enhancement factor in a microchip laser. Physical Review A. 2004;70(3). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.70.033809.
[40]	Xu Z, Li J, Zhang S, Tan Y, Zhang X, Lin X, et al. Remote eavesdropping at 200 meters distance based on laser feedback interferometry with single-photon sensitivity. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2021;141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2021.106562.
[41]	Glombitza U, Brinkmeyer E. Coherent frequency-domain reflectometry for characterization of single-mode integrated-optical wave-guides. J Lightwave Technol. 1993;11(8):1377–84. https://doi.org/10.1109/50.254098.
[42]	Moore ED, McLeod RR. Correction of sampling errors due to laser tuning rate fluctuations in swept-wavelength interferometry. Opt Express. 2008;16(17):13139–49. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.16.013139.
[43]	Jacquin O, Lacot E, Felix C, Hugon O. Laser optical feedback imaging insensitive to parasitic optical feedback. Appl Opt. 2007;46(27):6779–82. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.46.006779.
[44]	Zhang Y, Hines AS, Valdes G, Guzman F. Investigation and Mitigation of Noise Contributions in a Compact Heterodyne Interferometer. Sensors (Basel). 2021;21(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/s21175788.
[45]	Deborah M. Kane, K. Alan Shore. Unlocking Dynamical Diversity: Optical Feedback Effects on Semiconductor Lasers. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2005.
[46]	Tan Y, Zhang S, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Liu N. Response of microchip solid-state laser to external frequency-shifted feedback and its applications. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2912. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02912.
[47]	Zhang X, Pouls J, Wu MC. Laser frequency sweep linearization by iterative learning pre-distortion for FMCW LiDAR. Opt Express. 2019;27(7):9965–74. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.009965.
[48]	Zhao Y, Wang C, Zhao Y, Zhu D, Lu L. An all-fiber self-mixing range finder with tunable fiber ring cavity laser source. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 2020:1-. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2020.3043331.
[49]	Zehao Y, Cheng L, Guodong L. FMCW LiDAR with an FM nonlinear kernel function for dynamic-distance measurement. Optics Express. 2022;30(11). https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.458235.
[50]	Zheng J, Jia L, Zhai Y, Ni L, Gu W, Sun Y, et al. High-Precision Silicon-Integrated Frequency-Modulated Continuous Wave LiDAR Calibrated Using a Microresonator. ACS Photonics. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.2c00562.
[51]	Lacot E, Hugon O. Frequency-shifted optical feedback in a pumping laser diode dynamically amplified by a microchip laser. Appl Opt. 2004;43(25):4915–21. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.43.004915.
[52]	Qin J, Zhou Q, Xie W, Xu Y, Yu S, Liu Z, et al. Coherence enhancement of a chirped DFB laser for frequency-modulated continuous-wave reflectometry using a composite feedback loop. Opt Lett. 2015;40(19):4500–3. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.40.004500.
[53]	Wu H, Zhang F, Liu T, Balling P, Li J, Qu X. Long distance measurement using optical sampling by cavity tuning. Opt Lett. 2016;41(10):2366–9. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.002366.